 |
| SEIU's Mary Kay Henry and AFSCME's Lee Saunders |
Here’s
another item from the recently concluded SEIU Convention in Detroit: the
resolution calling for SEIU and AFSCME to work collaboratively and to explore
a full-blown merger. A full copy of the resolution is below.
The proposal
reportedly has been under discussion for a year by a committee formed
by the two unions.
According to
Tasty’s sources, the two unions’ merger discussions are driven by concerns
about Friedrichs v. California Teachers
Association, the U.S. Supreme Court case that could weaken public-sector
unions by challenging their right to collect fair share fees from nonmembers to
cover the costs of representation, such as negotiating contracts.
Together, SEIU
and AFSCME represent approximately 3 million public-sector workers.
In December
of 2015, the two unions
held
a first-ever meeting between their lawyers “to share ideas and best
practices to deal with issues confronting all public employees, such as
Friedrichs v. California Teachers Association…”
The three-day event began with
a panel discussion by SEIU President Mary
Kay Henry, Steve Fantauzzo
(Chief of Staff to AFSCME President Lee
Saunders), and each union’s general counsel.
In February,
the sudden death of Justice Antonin
Scalia left the court deadlocked on the Friedrichs case, with Senate Republicans subsequently refusing to consider Obama’s nominee to fill the vacant seat.
Scalia’s
death appears to have slowed the two unions’ plan for a full merger. The resolution
approved at SEIU’s convention holds open the possibility of a full-blown
merger while immediately calling for the establishment of “unity partnerships” between
the two unions at the local, state, and national levels in order to carry out
joint planning, organizing, bargaining, and political work.
These “unity
partnerships” sound a lot like the “unity councils” established by former SEIU
President Andy Stern, which were
intended to coordinate activities between SEIU locals.
However, Stern’s
manipulation of the “unity councils” -- including the Purple Palace’s blunt rigging
of their votes -- was one of the actions that pushed California healthcare
workers
to
rebel against SEIU’s top officials in 2008.
The following are excerpts from the resolution recently passed at SEIU’s convention,
entitled “
AFSCME and SEIU: Unstoppable Unions that Never Quit.”
In a stunning display
of their newfound coordination, the resolution’s title manages to include both SEIU’s and AFSCME’s 2016 convention
themes: “Unstoppable” and “Never Quit.” Tasty can only imagine the multiple planning meetings needed to devise convention themes that could be wrapped together into a single resolution title!
AFSCME will presumably
consider a similar resolution at its upcoming International Convention in Las
Vegas on July 18-22. Here are the excerpts:
Our vision requires the creation of “unity
partnerships” at the national, state and local levels. Unity partnerships may
include some or all of the following activities: joint goal setting and planning;
joint bargaining and representational activities where we have a common
employer and coordinated bargaining where we represent workers in the same
industry and labor market; joint setting of priorities and strategies where we
deal with the same legislative and/or administrative bodies; joint political
activity where we share an interest in electoral outcomes; and joint
communication, legal, mobilization and research strategies and activities to
support our work…
Based on the durability and effectiveness of
the partnerships that are developed at the national, state and local levels, we
will explore ways to deepen and expand our collaborative efforts, including
consideration of an institutional merger that would formally unite the
strengths of both our unions to create a new entity…
Our unions will convene a joint committee to
foster the collaboration that we envision and to review and modify our process
as needed. The International Executive Boards of SEIU and AFSCME shall be
empowered to modify or end the collaboration between our unions described in
this resolution. Any proposed structural changes must be recommended by both
international Executive Boards and shall be submitted to a vote in accordance
with each union’s constitution and bylaws.
While the
last sentence references “a vote,” it doesn’t indicate who would be allowed to
participate in the votes.
