It looks like things are spiraling downwards at
SEIU-UHW. Last month, more than 40 members of SEIU-UHW’s Executive Board
demanded a meeting with
Dave Regan to address a deepening crisis at the union... including the lack of democracy, the failure to represent union members (or even return their phone calls), SEIU's loyalty oaths, disrespect towards members (including by SEIU's
Joe Simoes), the deepening crisis in SEIU-UHW's Kaiser Division, etc.
A source gave Tasty a copy of the materials, including this email from
Alisha Blinks (an Executive Board member) to other board members. (FYI- the
bold and underlined text is exactly how it appeared in the original email.)
From: Alisha Blinks
Subject: Meeting with
Dave Agenda
Date: Monday, December
12, 2011, 4:01 AM
Good Evening Everyone;
Below you will find
the agenda for Tuesday's meeting with Dave.
We will be meeting first at the UHW office among ourselves from 7-730PM
and then with Dave. These membership specific
issues should cover the North and South.
Just remember this is only the beginning of the talks to get our union
back on track. I will keep notes to
report out to the South. There will be NO AGREEMENTS MADE WITH THIS REGIME
UNTIL WE ARE ALL TOGETHER AS ONE BODY!
I WILL SEE ALL OF YOU
TUESDAY
Day: Tuesday December
13 2011
Time: 7:00PM (7-730PM
will be a quick briefing)
Place: UHW Office
560 Thomas L Berkeley Way
Oakland CA
Blinks's email also contains a two-page memo -- entitled “Crux of Complaint” -- that paints a dire
picture of life under the "Regan regime." (A complete copy of the memo is
here). Here's what it says:
The Kaiser Division is in crisis and below is the reasons
why we cannot function with these problems any longer. Deadlines aren’t being kept, staff is not
showing up to appointments and the support for the leaders at the facilities
from staff is absent from this equation. The usage of the Steward Councils to promote organizing campaigns,
pushing of agendas not ratified, constant aggravation to the members requesting
their loyalty; where is the Kaiser Division’s loyalty to us? No trainings, no regional input, no report
outs but only consistent training of how to organize, agitate a member or give
a CRE. Members want protection, security and fairness from their employer and
their union. The priorities of this leadership and the governing body are on
opposite ends and it is our responsibility to correct this as a whole and it
first starts with listening on the leaderships part…
The Kaiser Division Director [Joe Simoes] and Sr. Staff members are
making inappropriate comments to rank and file leaders, along with mischievous
behavior that's inexcusable. This
leadership continues to act divisive and pitting members against one
another. It is disrespectful,
disheartening and will no longer be tolerated.
The democracy this union scarcely holds onto is beginning to rapidly
diminish. Instead of forming a cohesive
working relationship which can benefit us all we are constantly apologizing to
our members for failed processes.
Moreover, calls from staff aren’t being returned, emails not responded
to and it has reached the point where members and leaders are just being
ignored. Our house is not in order…
This membership body has been patient, transparent and
forthright in wanting to partner, however this behavior has not been
reciprocated by the current leadership. This sixty plus year union is the way
it is because of the knowledge of our leaders, the protection of our members
and unity we share. We are tired of
being in a race to the BOTTOM!
The memo also includes an agenda for the board members' meeting with Regan that includes these complaints (b/t/w, "KDSC" refers to the Kaiser Division Steward Council):
- Violation of the Constitution/KDSC By-Laws and Policies
- Flawed Communication
- Staff Absenteeism in Kaiser
- Failure to Adhere to the Constitution and Bylaws
- Failure to Respect Member Ratifications
Wow... The documents are quite a stunning indictment of Dave Regan... especially because they're authored by insiders who've been longtime loyal supporters of Regan/SEIU. For example, the group includes people like John Duff, Tinesha Thomas, Shirley Shirlee, Donna Norton, Darnita Garry, Linda Corkill, Diane Barton, Tonya Salcido, Tamika Harris, Treasell Sanders, Jennie Edney, China Newton, etc. And the fact that so many of the union's board members are in open revolt against Regan underscores the seriousness of the problems gripping the union.
So what sorts of "agreements" are the former loyalists trying to extract from the "Regan regime?" And what maneuvers will Regan try to use to either buy off or marginalize his critics? Put on your body armor!